Home › Forums › General Baby Care › Recalls/Warnings › I'm scared regarding my son's Dr. Brown's bottles
- This topic has 3 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 13, 2008 at 2:04 pm #48199AnonymousInactiveI’m sure some of you already heard about this, but there is relatively new research out which indicates that commonly used plastic baby bottles have the potential to be toxic due to the chemical bisphenol A:
http://www.propeller.com/viewstory/2008/02/08/toxic-baby-bottles/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cbsnews.com%2Fstories%2F2008 %2F02%2F07%2Fhealth%2Fmain3804860.shtml&frame=true
Now I am very scared because the my son must use “Dr. Brown’s” bottles his acid reflux/GERD and that brand was found to have the highest level of toxicity when tested.
The researchers recommend not heating bottles (but what baby likes to drink cold formula/ pumped breastmilk….and how can you be sure a bottle is clean/sterile if you are not using a hot water to clean it, whether it be from a dishwasher, boiling, or sterilizer.? This makes no sense. They recommend not using a bottle brush to clean them too) They also recommend switching to glass bottles.
Dr. Brown’s is supposedly coming out with a new plastic bottle that will be BPA free in a month or so, but I bet they will charge an arm and a leg for it. They already charge around $50 USD for a mere 6 glass bottles, which I think is totally CRAZY. I mean, it’s basic glass, it should not cost that much.
Now I am paranoid that my son will be suffer ill effects because of this. He’s been drinking out of these bottle with BPA since birth.
I will probably be buying all new glass bottles, despite the ridiculous price, but I already spent so much money on the original plastic ones, that I feel it is a rip off.
This leads me to another question: Do any parents on here know about a brand of GLASS bottle other than Dr. Brown’s that can still fit with the Dr. Brown’s nipples and vent system? I’m thinking that might be the way to go since Dr. Brown’s glass bottles are ridiculously expensive at every store in my area.February 13, 2008 at 4:49 pm #48201hellbenntKeymasterthere IS an answer to your question!
I just can’t find it!I actually researched this awhile back for my friendI did a quick search & got this;search the site, it’s the BEST!I emailed/posted there, too, so this should helpETA (edited to add): ooops. that was an old thread. apparently there are glass dr brown bottles nowadays(?)hellbennt2008-02-13 18:48:53
February 15, 2008 at 6:59 am #48249AnonymousInactiveI think that it’s scary when any new health scare comes out, especially regarding our children. But before getting really worried, I think that it’s important to read the source data, meaning the original info, as the media tends to exaggerate for headlines and shock value.
If you’re looking for a good glass bottle, we have ones made by “born free” here in Canada that are exactly like the Dr. B’s pretty much, even with a venting system.About the bisphenol A levels in the study you’re talking about, it was actually avent that had the highest levels. But here is a reply I gave a while back to this same topic. I’ll post it below:————————————————————————————I’m always cautious about the way the media presents these kinds of facts. Since I can’t find the statement issued by the FDA on this topic, I thought that I’d summarize what I read from the source article.
The following facts in bold come directly from the original position paper cited and the description of the methodology used to conduct the cited research.
About baby bottles and bisphenol A:
Bisphenol A is a chemical that is found throughout our environment, most of which comes from plastics. It is present in our drinking water, our bath water, our blood, and tissues. Testing of the ill effects of bisphenol A have come from laboratory studies on rats and other lab animals, and have been extrapolated to humans. In human testing, they have found that over 95 percent of people tested have detectable levels in their blood which are considered to be high, and are greater than those found to cause harm in LAB ANIMALS, namely rats, without any ill effects. Further, HUMAN fetal blood was also found to have amounts higher than those found to be harmful in lab animal studies.
Our drinking water has levels at 5mg/L, which is also considered high.
For the purpose of this study, all bottles were incubated in water at temperatures of 80 degrees celcius for 24 hours, in order to simulate 50-75 dishwashing cycles using the SANITIZING cycle which brings the water up to disproportionately high temperatures.
Unfortunately, I can’t find the statement that I read from the FDA on this issue, but basically what I read was that the FDA commented that while Bisphenol A is present in baby bottles, the leaching of the chemical when used as directed on the instructions is minimal. Bottles are never exposed to the conditions as done in this study, and bottles would never be heated at such high temperatures for such a long period of time. Also measurements of the chemicals would be higher in bottles that were just heated, which is why bottle users are directed to allow the bottles to cool before using. Also, the amounts of chemical exposure have never been linked to disease in humans, but in rat studies, so they really don’t know what the exact effects of this chemical are in humans, and what the levels are that would cause harm in humans.
We and our babies are already being exposed to this and many other chemicals from the second they are conceived through our blood supply and the chemicals that we ingest. From what I’ve read, the chemical is already found at significant concentrations in our water- the water that we are using to prepare our children’s food and formula and that they are drinking already.
I remember a while back there was some terrible study published on the chemicals in human breast milk, including bisphenol A among a list of others. People became very upset about this, and the media tried to suggest that our breast milk was somehow contaminated, while we all know that breast milk is the best thing that we can feed to a baby. I think what it comes down to is that our world is contaminated, and we really can’t escape these things that are in our environment, our foods, and all around us. We can only make the best choices we can based on a risk-benefit analysis. I definitely agree that a better-safe-than-sorry approach is always best when possible. If you can easily use a safer alternative or adopt new practices to minimize exposure, then why not. But it seems like simply replacing worn bottles and avoiding putting them in the dishwasher is probably enough. (But that’s just my opinion.)
February 15, 2008 at 10:04 pm #48279AnonymousInactiveHi. Thanks so much for your replies. I did read the original study in which the bottles were heated for 24 hours, They linked to it in the CBS news article. It still scared me quite a bit though. I always use my dishwasher to clean the bottles and they are used/cleaned quite often, so I still wondered if there could be cumulative damage to the plastic bottles that contain BPA. And I will admit that I feel overhwlemed with the idea of not putting them in the dishwasher, because my dishwasher saves me so much time.
So I resorted to EBAY. I ended up finding Dr. Brown’s glass bottles there for much cheaper than what stores are selling them for. (…sigh…more money out the window….but I guess I can’t put a price on peace of mind.) -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.